Local
communities, properly called peripheral forest communities living on
the threshold of forests in many parts of the world, often remain
marginalized in decisions and policies related to forests, biodiversity
and the environment as a whole. Clearly,
decision-makers and key members of government delegations have stated
that they involve local residents living in forest territories in
policies affecting the use and / or management of resources. How participatory participation to participate naked poses the question of what really means participatory involvement.
As a general rule, forest ecologists and government institutions usually conclude their plans on forest resource management and policies developed before sending the draft prepared traditional authorities. Simply send the document to the traditional traditional authorities to find out what they have already decided instead of seeking their views on the sustainable use and viable and proven management of biodiversity resources in their environment. They prepare the music and strength of these traditional authorities to dance on the air. This is not what involves participation in decision-making.
Sometimes legislators only invite a small fraction of some supreme leaders to sit at seminars and forums where forest and environmental policies are discussed. This is mainly reflected in the lack of presentation of such functions resulting in little or no voice of local populations who legitimately own these surviving forest resources. Thus, government policies without their consent and opinions have repeatedly failed in its implementation process.
Therefore, for genuinely participatory participation, responsible for policy and environmental advocates should organize seminars and forums in villages that allow the universal expression of the views of all sectors of the community, including the marginalized Society, such as women and children. Like poor peasants, hunters and fishermen. Consent must be sought at all stages of policy development. Their views need to be analyzed in depth, weighed and taken into account in the plans and strategies of environmental and forestry policies. As a regional and national discourse on environmental policy, a larger population of equitable representation of different groups in communities with forest bands should be represented before taking any important decisions on the use and sustainable management of the environment and Of its resources. This would ensure an effective policy implementation process.
It is true that local people living in marginal forest communities can not read and write but has proven and experience in environmental management that could provide a breakthrough for modern environmental management and its Knowledge of resources. This traditional ecological knowledge is cheaper and would not pass through the bureaucratic waste of time and scientific processes.
Of course, forest communities accept environmental policies because they feel they are part, their views are respected, and as such massive support and ensure full implementation of the implementation of Environmental policies. This would help to reduce the abuse of environmental resources that prevail in communities with forest fringes because of the permanent blockage between them and politicians and ecologists. Ultimately motivate local populations to monitor environmental resources, while ensuring that they are used sustainably to meet the needs of present and future générations.
As a general rule, forest ecologists and government institutions usually conclude their plans on forest resource management and policies developed before sending the draft prepared traditional authorities. Simply send the document to the traditional traditional authorities to find out what they have already decided instead of seeking their views on the sustainable use and viable and proven management of biodiversity resources in their environment. They prepare the music and strength of these traditional authorities to dance on the air. This is not what involves participation in decision-making.
Sometimes legislators only invite a small fraction of some supreme leaders to sit at seminars and forums where forest and environmental policies are discussed. This is mainly reflected in the lack of presentation of such functions resulting in little or no voice of local populations who legitimately own these surviving forest resources. Thus, government policies without their consent and opinions have repeatedly failed in its implementation process.
Therefore, for genuinely participatory participation, responsible for policy and environmental advocates should organize seminars and forums in villages that allow the universal expression of the views of all sectors of the community, including the marginalized Society, such as women and children. Like poor peasants, hunters and fishermen. Consent must be sought at all stages of policy development. Their views need to be analyzed in depth, weighed and taken into account in the plans and strategies of environmental and forestry policies. As a regional and national discourse on environmental policy, a larger population of equitable representation of different groups in communities with forest bands should be represented before taking any important decisions on the use and sustainable management of the environment and Of its resources. This would ensure an effective policy implementation process.
It is true that local people living in marginal forest communities can not read and write but has proven and experience in environmental management that could provide a breakthrough for modern environmental management and its Knowledge of resources. This traditional ecological knowledge is cheaper and would not pass through the bureaucratic waste of time and scientific processes.
Of course, forest communities accept environmental policies because they feel they are part, their views are respected, and as such massive support and ensure full implementation of the implementation of Environmental policies. This would help to reduce the abuse of environmental resources that prevail in communities with forest fringes because of the permanent blockage between them and politicians and ecologists. Ultimately motivate local populations to monitor environmental resources, while ensuring that they are used sustainably to meet the needs of present and future générations.
http://www.annonces.immo-reve.com/
https://www.facebook.com/immo.reve.tn
https://www.facebook.com/immo.reve.tn
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire