Food security is in the news again. First,
the Supreme Court stopped some states for failing to implement the
National Food Security Act, 2013, even after two years since it became
law. Then came the murmur of NDA government planning to allocate 130,000 crore this Act.
Although food security is most often in the news for all the wrong reasons in most countries, the fact that the debate in India where an estimated 194.6 million people undernourished lights (the state of food insecurity in the world, 2015), is certainly a surprise.
Why a system that promises to do good for people, is subject to the stone? Promises rights to food grain for the poor through the public distribution system (PDS), the rights and lunches for schoolchildren and nutritious for children under six nutritional benefits and even motherhood in monetary form . Why then, we are still critical process of most neighborhoods?
It should be noted that the debate on the mission of national food security is largely fueled by unfounded and exaggerated claims figures. And amidst all this chaos, the concerns and the positive aspects of the true concept seem to have taken a back seat.
Most people can not understand that food security not only protects people from poverty and insecurity, but also plays an important role in economic growth. While it is clearly critical about how much it will cost the Treasury arguing that the country does not have the income to support it, people seem to overlook the fact that it can do good as well.
One area that can yield positive results is the domain of human development. In an economy where malnutrition is common human resources, it is the most affected. In the absence of a safety system well developed food, the government will spend a large portion of GDP in the other workarounds. So he could direct it to other areas of economic development.
In addition, food security results in improving nutrition, which in turn, results in a reduction in expenditure in the health sector. It can then be used for other social protection programs to eradicate poverty and other social ills such.
Being fed and insured makes them more productive and people as obvious as it seems a productive workforce reflects positively on the economy. Conversely, the dangerous work force and malnourished are more likely to be the opposite of the desired effect on the economy.
It may seem that economic growth can not solve the problem of malnutrition, but this is not entirely true; not with the unequal distribution of food resources and food waste, at least.
According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations the number of undernourished people increased from 1.3 billion in 1990 to $ 794 million in 2014. Although the reduction 209 million dollar means that things work, but also implies that more proactive measures are necessary because there are 794 million people out there who do not always receive nutritious food.
Although the food safety system is probably proactive, part of the application that should be given attention, which is difficult with all the negativity that surrounds it.
Having enough food to eat is certainly a strong incentive; It is as simple as arriving. It is another thing that such initiatives often drown in the game of political one-upmanship.
http://www.annonces.immo-reve.com/
https://www.facebook.com/immo.reve.tn
Although food security is most often in the news for all the wrong reasons in most countries, the fact that the debate in India where an estimated 194.6 million people undernourished lights (the state of food insecurity in the world, 2015), is certainly a surprise.
Why a system that promises to do good for people, is subject to the stone? Promises rights to food grain for the poor through the public distribution system (PDS), the rights and lunches for schoolchildren and nutritious for children under six nutritional benefits and even motherhood in monetary form . Why then, we are still critical process of most neighborhoods?
It should be noted that the debate on the mission of national food security is largely fueled by unfounded and exaggerated claims figures. And amidst all this chaos, the concerns and the positive aspects of the true concept seem to have taken a back seat.
Most people can not understand that food security not only protects people from poverty and insecurity, but also plays an important role in economic growth. While it is clearly critical about how much it will cost the Treasury arguing that the country does not have the income to support it, people seem to overlook the fact that it can do good as well.
One area that can yield positive results is the domain of human development. In an economy where malnutrition is common human resources, it is the most affected. In the absence of a safety system well developed food, the government will spend a large portion of GDP in the other workarounds. So he could direct it to other areas of economic development.
In addition, food security results in improving nutrition, which in turn, results in a reduction in expenditure in the health sector. It can then be used for other social protection programs to eradicate poverty and other social ills such.
Being fed and insured makes them more productive and people as obvious as it seems a productive workforce reflects positively on the economy. Conversely, the dangerous work force and malnourished are more likely to be the opposite of the desired effect on the economy.
It may seem that economic growth can not solve the problem of malnutrition, but this is not entirely true; not with the unequal distribution of food resources and food waste, at least.
According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations the number of undernourished people increased from 1.3 billion in 1990 to $ 794 million in 2014. Although the reduction 209 million dollar means that things work, but also implies that more proactive measures are necessary because there are 794 million people out there who do not always receive nutritious food.
Although the food safety system is probably proactive, part of the application that should be given attention, which is difficult with all the negativity that surrounds it.
Having enough food to eat is certainly a strong incentive; It is as simple as arriving. It is another thing that such initiatives often drown in the game of political one-upmanship.
http://www.annonces.immo-reve.com/
https://www.facebook.com/immo.reve.tn
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire