It
has been much discussion about the relative effectiveness of different
styles of leadership in achieving better performance of students. The
author agrees that the direction in all teaching-learning process is an
essential tool in the development of environmentally among students,
where students can develop skills for lifelong learning. instructional
leadership can be defined as "the actions of a school administrator
exercises or delegated to others, to promote the development and
improvement of student learning." In practice, this means that the school administrator encourages
academic success by teaching quality the top priority school and brings
that vision to realization.
The role of instructional leader differs from the administrator of the traditional school into a number of important ways. While a conventional principal spends most of his / her time to face strictly administrative duties, a director who is an instructional leader, he is in charge of redefining his / her role to become an apprentice in a primary search Community for excellence in teaching. Therefore, it is the administrator's responsibility to the school of good human relationships with teachers and students to achieve those goals.It is a universal concept accepted in the academic world which means essentially educational leader being the leader of leaders whose function is to create a culture of learning by mastering the art and science of effective leadership. The role and responsibility of the contemporary educational leader requires a leadership style that focuses on teacher development that promotes student's training. successful educational leaders encourage and inspire faculty and staff to create a culture of learning that effective teaching practices drowned. School administrators can achieve this paradigm shift and be efficient and effective in conducting other education stakeholders to work together to have a positive attitude on the final results of education. The main objective of this research is investigation the determination of leadership practices of school administrators in effect education in Nueva Vizcaya, as perceived by graduate students enrolled in the school during the 2011-2012 school year campus NVSU Bambang.
This study aims to provide sound ideas on leadership of behavioral enrichment within the organization to achieve their goals and objectives, and even creating a healthy school environment which is essential for improving the quality of teaching and education quality time.
This study provided a good reference database or all teachers in the division that allows them to become aware of existing leadership styles instruction of their administrators and clean and healthy expression of human relations skills in the management and supervision of their organization and their relative importance in the development of a sensitive and continuing the teaching-learning situation improves. Specifically, this study answers the following questions: How do students evaluate instructional leadership practices of the graduate school of management and leadership, coaching, supporting and delegating?
This study used descriptive research method that uses a structured like the main questionnaire data collection tool. this method was adopted because the study is to describe certain phenomena, and that was to find information or to meet with respondents interpretation.The analytical study were 72 students enrolled in graduate school at during the 2011-2012 school year NVSU Bambang Campus. the instructional leadership practices of school administrators were asked to evaluate the questionnaire using a 50 piece on the steering behavior of an administrator that determine the pedagogical practices of its management leadership. The data collected were subjected to appropriate statistical procedure.
Based on the assessment of the respondents, with an average of 3.45, its managers are often manifested as direct instructional leadership practices.
This can be interpreted to mean that school administrators still retain a decision-final power in the department, and supported his faculty and staff when it came to parents. In addition, they have a full charge in an emergency arise, and still maintain the defined performance standards.
Respondents also perceived that their managers sometimes considered as suggestions made by its faculty and staff, and tell them that the procedure does not work properly. The same respondent groups sometimes listen to their subordinates, and sometimes they agree with their teachers and staff have the right to determine their own organizational objectives.
In addition, the same respondents perceive that their managers rarely or directly threaten their faculty and staff to achieve the goals / objectives of the organization and coercion rarely used to motivate their subordinates. On the other hand, they rarely allow the new government to make decisions and implement the latest trends unconscious.
Respondents perceive that their school administrators often use the practice of coaching instructional leadership with 3.99 average.
The above results can be interpreted as meaning that their school administrators always allow the power to vote whenever an important decision must be made, and monitor if they are working properly. Still, it acts as a spokesman for the department and enjoy your train faculty and staff of the new task and procedure. They always interact with faculty and staff and create enthusiasm for a project.
The same group of respondents perceive their school administrators "often" ask for ideas and feedback from faculty and staff on plans and future projects and tell them what to do and how he will. In addition, they often like to share their power leadership with subordinates, so they know what is expected of them and ensure that their work is coordinated.
However, the same group of respondents perceive that their managers sometimes tells his faculty and staff to make a mistake and take note of what sometimes hear that teachers and staff seek above all safety. students graduate schools perceive that their school administrators always "support" are used as the instructional leadership style, as indicated by the large media 4.56.
The above results can be interpreted as meaning that school administrators always "call a meeting for teachers and staff for advice in case of problems and the need to create a strategy to maintain a project or process running on time, and encourage them to participate in decision making. In addition, teaching strategies are known and have time to enjoy reading articles, books and magazines on training, leadership and psychology. Respondents still working with his subordinate to solve problems, listen to both sides of the story before making a decision, carefully assess situations before acting, and are committed to developing the strength of his department.
The same group of respondents "often" ask your faculty and staff for their vision of where they see their task to go and allows them to use this view when appropriate priorities and created under his leadership. In addition, they often agree that each individual is responsible for the definition of their work, assigning tasks during the planning period, and remain calm when things are uncertain.
Respondents perceived their school administrators always used "delegate" the practice of instructional leadership with 4.30 average.
This can be interpreted as meaning that school administrators "always" keep the defined standards of performance, and watch your faculty and staff know how to use creativity and ingenuity to solve organizational problems. They are always agree with my faculty and staff will exercise self-direction if they are committed to the objectives, and want to create an environment where employees take ownership of projects. The same group of respondents is always ready to make changes and always full support of the situation when emergency situations arise. On the other hand, school administrators often delegate tasks to implement a new procedure or process, and treat all subordinates as equals. They often delegate responsibility and find it easy to perform multiple complex tasks simultaneously and hold their subordinates accountable. Finally, administrators often manifest management school and training as instructional leadership practices, as evaluated by students enrolled Graduate School NVSU Bambang Campus. The same group of respondents perceive their school administrators always supporting and delegating clear instructional leadership practices.
http://www.annonces.immo-reve.com/
https://www.facebook.com/immo.reve.tn
The role of instructional leader differs from the administrator of the traditional school into a number of important ways. While a conventional principal spends most of his / her time to face strictly administrative duties, a director who is an instructional leader, he is in charge of redefining his / her role to become an apprentice in a primary search Community for excellence in teaching. Therefore, it is the administrator's responsibility to the school of good human relationships with teachers and students to achieve those goals.It is a universal concept accepted in the academic world which means essentially educational leader being the leader of leaders whose function is to create a culture of learning by mastering the art and science of effective leadership. The role and responsibility of the contemporary educational leader requires a leadership style that focuses on teacher development that promotes student's training. successful educational leaders encourage and inspire faculty and staff to create a culture of learning that effective teaching practices drowned. School administrators can achieve this paradigm shift and be efficient and effective in conducting other education stakeholders to work together to have a positive attitude on the final results of education. The main objective of this research is investigation the determination of leadership practices of school administrators in effect education in Nueva Vizcaya, as perceived by graduate students enrolled in the school during the 2011-2012 school year campus NVSU Bambang.
This study aims to provide sound ideas on leadership of behavioral enrichment within the organization to achieve their goals and objectives, and even creating a healthy school environment which is essential for improving the quality of teaching and education quality time.
This study provided a good reference database or all teachers in the division that allows them to become aware of existing leadership styles instruction of their administrators and clean and healthy expression of human relations skills in the management and supervision of their organization and their relative importance in the development of a sensitive and continuing the teaching-learning situation improves. Specifically, this study answers the following questions: How do students evaluate instructional leadership practices of the graduate school of management and leadership, coaching, supporting and delegating?
This study used descriptive research method that uses a structured like the main questionnaire data collection tool. this method was adopted because the study is to describe certain phenomena, and that was to find information or to meet with respondents interpretation.The analytical study were 72 students enrolled in graduate school at during the 2011-2012 school year NVSU Bambang Campus. the instructional leadership practices of school administrators were asked to evaluate the questionnaire using a 50 piece on the steering behavior of an administrator that determine the pedagogical practices of its management leadership. The data collected were subjected to appropriate statistical procedure.
Based on the assessment of the respondents, with an average of 3.45, its managers are often manifested as direct instructional leadership practices.
This can be interpreted to mean that school administrators still retain a decision-final power in the department, and supported his faculty and staff when it came to parents. In addition, they have a full charge in an emergency arise, and still maintain the defined performance standards.
Respondents also perceived that their managers sometimes considered as suggestions made by its faculty and staff, and tell them that the procedure does not work properly. The same respondent groups sometimes listen to their subordinates, and sometimes they agree with their teachers and staff have the right to determine their own organizational objectives.
In addition, the same respondents perceive that their managers rarely or directly threaten their faculty and staff to achieve the goals / objectives of the organization and coercion rarely used to motivate their subordinates. On the other hand, they rarely allow the new government to make decisions and implement the latest trends unconscious.
Respondents perceive that their school administrators often use the practice of coaching instructional leadership with 3.99 average.
The above results can be interpreted as meaning that their school administrators always allow the power to vote whenever an important decision must be made, and monitor if they are working properly. Still, it acts as a spokesman for the department and enjoy your train faculty and staff of the new task and procedure. They always interact with faculty and staff and create enthusiasm for a project.
The same group of respondents perceive their school administrators "often" ask for ideas and feedback from faculty and staff on plans and future projects and tell them what to do and how he will. In addition, they often like to share their power leadership with subordinates, so they know what is expected of them and ensure that their work is coordinated.
However, the same group of respondents perceive that their managers sometimes tells his faculty and staff to make a mistake and take note of what sometimes hear that teachers and staff seek above all safety. students graduate schools perceive that their school administrators always "support" are used as the instructional leadership style, as indicated by the large media 4.56.
The above results can be interpreted as meaning that school administrators always "call a meeting for teachers and staff for advice in case of problems and the need to create a strategy to maintain a project or process running on time, and encourage them to participate in decision making. In addition, teaching strategies are known and have time to enjoy reading articles, books and magazines on training, leadership and psychology. Respondents still working with his subordinate to solve problems, listen to both sides of the story before making a decision, carefully assess situations before acting, and are committed to developing the strength of his department.
The same group of respondents "often" ask your faculty and staff for their vision of where they see their task to go and allows them to use this view when appropriate priorities and created under his leadership. In addition, they often agree that each individual is responsible for the definition of their work, assigning tasks during the planning period, and remain calm when things are uncertain.
Respondents perceived their school administrators always used "delegate" the practice of instructional leadership with 4.30 average.
This can be interpreted as meaning that school administrators "always" keep the defined standards of performance, and watch your faculty and staff know how to use creativity and ingenuity to solve organizational problems. They are always agree with my faculty and staff will exercise self-direction if they are committed to the objectives, and want to create an environment where employees take ownership of projects. The same group of respondents is always ready to make changes and always full support of the situation when emergency situations arise. On the other hand, school administrators often delegate tasks to implement a new procedure or process, and treat all subordinates as equals. They often delegate responsibility and find it easy to perform multiple complex tasks simultaneously and hold their subordinates accountable. Finally, administrators often manifest management school and training as instructional leadership practices, as evaluated by students enrolled Graduate School NVSU Bambang Campus. The same group of respondents perceive their school administrators always supporting and delegating clear instructional leadership practices.
http://www.annonces.immo-reve.com/
https://www.facebook.com/immo.reve.tn
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire